Taking a step that many in the securities regulatory world predicted, on August 14, 2026, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance (the “Division”) announced it would no longer respond to requests from companies to exclude shareholder proposals from proxy statements pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 14a-8 (including Rule 14a-8(i)(1)), until further

Speaking at the Society for Corporate Governance Conference in Nashville earlier this month, Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Chair Paul Atkins addressed two major themes for public companies:  restoring materiality as the foundation of public company disclosure and reconsidering the shareholder proposal process under Rule 14a-8.  Chair Atkins connected those themes to the SEC’s broader

In many ways, the 2026 proxy season has been markedly different than prior seasons, due, in no small part, to the November 2025 decision by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff not to provide substantive guidance on the grounds on which a company could omit a shareholder proposal under most prongs of Rule

The 2026 proxy season thus far has been out-of-the-ordinary, impacted by regulatory and policy developments that required companies and shareholders to adapt their shareholder proposal and engagement strategies. As a result of these unusual circumstances, particularly when coupled with uncertainty about the evolving role of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and potential rule changes

The Shareholder Rights Group, a shareholder rights advocacy group, recently published an initial report on the 2026 shareholder proposal season, titled “Shareholder Proposals and Corporate Governance in a Season of Regulatory Uncertainty.”  The report touches on the regulatory backdrop that set the stage for the unusual proxy season (read about it here, here and

A new large-scale survey released just last week by the John L. Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware offers important insights into the shareholder proposal process under SEC Rule 14a-8 from various different perspectives.  The survey comes at an important time, when shareholder rights and the proxy proposal process are being

On November 17, 2025, the Divisions of Corporation Finance and Investment Management (together, the “Divisions”) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) published a statement (the “Statement”) regarding their respective reviews of requests to exclude shareholder proposals from annual proxy statements under Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

On December 11, 2025, the President signed an Executive Order titled “Protecting American Investors from Foreign-Owned and Politically-Motivated Proxy Advisors” (the “EO”).  The EO focuses on the influence of proxy advisory firms, specifically Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”) and Glass, Lewis & Co. (“Glass Lewis”).  According to the EO, ISS and Glass Lewis control over 90%

In November 2025, ISS Governance (“ISS”) announced its global Benchmark Proxy Voting Guidelines for shareholder meetings with dates on or after February 1, 2026.  Consistent with prior years, the 2026 updates were derived from extensive outreach to institutional investors, companies and other affiliated organizations.  According to ISS, its proxy voting guidelines “are guided by the