A significant revision to the Delaware General Corporation Law has changed how corporations approve transactions with their directors, officers, and controlling stockholders. The amendments include “safe harbor” protection from certain equitable and monetary claims for qualifying transactions. This Legal Update offers a step-by-step guide for boards evaluating transactions under this new framework.  

Continue reading this

In this episode (approx. 10 minutes), Professor Anat Alon-Beck of Case-Western Reserve University School of Law (follow her work on SSRN) talks to us about her scholarship. In particular, Prof. Alon-Beck discusses some of the findings regarding competition among states to attract businesses—including Texas and Nevada. Prof. Alon-Beck also discusses incorporation trends for growth

Delaware Governor Matt Meyer signed Senate Bill 21 (“SB 21”) into law Tuesday night, pushing forward a measure that has drawn strong criticism from shareholder and consumer advocacy groups.

The bill made its way to the governor’s desk after a debate in the House, where it passed with a 32 to 7 vote and two members

On February 17, 2025, the Delaware legislature introduced Senate Bill 21 (SB21) and Senate Concurrent Resolution 17 (SCR17).  SB21 proposes amendments to the Delaware General Corporate Law (DGCL) that expand the safe harbor afforded in the context of certain interested transactions, while also proposing amendments to the DGCL 220 concerning books and records inspections.  SCR17

On February 4, 2025, the Delaware Supreme Court (the “Court”) overturned a prior ruling by the Delaware Court of Chancery, which subjected TripAdvisor Inc.’s (“TripAdvisor”) and Liberty TripAdvisor Holdings Inc.’s (“Liberty”) corporate conversions to Nevada to an entire fairness review. Instead, the Court determined that the business judgment rule was the appropriate standard of review

In August 2022, the Delaware General Assembly amended the Delaware General Corporation Law to allow corporations to adopt charter provisions exculpating certain officers from personal liability for monetary damages for breaches of the duty of care. Since that time, observers have considered to what extent Delaware public company boards would propose officer exculpation amendments (“OEAs”)

On January 29, 2024, in Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. v. Ainslie, the Delaware Supreme Court reversed a Chancery Court holding that a forfeiture-for-competition provision in a limited partnership agreement was unenforceable as an unreasonable restraint of trade. Applying the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (“DRULPA”), the Supreme Court held that (i) the forfeiture-for-competition provision

Natural as it is to let your hair down in casual podcasts about business and life, these candid off-the-cuff remarks can come back to bite you, including in multi-million dollar lawsuits where judges weigh podcast statements more than sworn testimony. That is a cautionary headline for everyone, set forth on page 10 of a recent